William Summers

North West Norfolk Liberal Democrats

Standing up for North West Norfolk

Search this site:
Sign up!

In the news

Lib Dems announce schools funding commitment

February 1st, 2010

Father and sonThe Liberal Democrats have announced a major funding commitment which could drastically boost education in West Norfolk schools.

Party leader Nick Clegg has today set out the Liberal Democrat manifesto commitment for a ‘Pupil Premium’ that would invest around £36m of extra cash in schools across the county – including many in West Norfolk – raising the funding for disadvantaged pupils to private school levels.

The money will be invested through the Pupil Premium pledge, part of the Liberal Democrats’ £2.5bn manifesto spending commitment.

William Summers, parliamentary candidate for North West Norfolk said:

“It’s a scandal that children across West Norfolk continue to lose out under the current Labour government.

“Some of the schools here receive significantly less money than the national average, which is damaging the life chances of our children right from the word go.

“Under our plans, schools right across Norfolk would get a further £36m to help cut class sizes and provide more individual support.”

Liberal Democrat Leader Nick Clegg said:

“With this unfairness in funding it’s no surprise there is such a gap in achievement between children from the poorest backgrounds and those families who are better off.

“Only when we get education funding back on track will be able to give all our children the fair start they deserve.”

 
MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE PUPIL PREMIUM:

1. The policy in brief

To give every child a fair start, Liberal Democrats will spend an extra £2.5bn on schools. The money will be targeted at schools taking on children who need more help, but will benefit every child in every school. The cash can be used to cut class sizes and provide one-to-one tuition or catch-up classes, ensuring every child gets the individual attention they need. An average primary school could cut class sizes to 20. An average secondary school could see classes of just 16.

Why is it necessary?

Performance at school is closely linked to children’s background. The poorest children are only half as likely to get five good GCSEs as other children. Too often, the poorest children start school already struggling and fall further behind as they grow older.

Schools taking disadvantaged children aren’t getting the money they need to cut class sizes and provide them with extra support. The existing methods for distributing deprivation related funding are confusing and inconsistent. Nearly one in three pupils entitled to Free School Meals at secondary school attend relatively affluent secondary schools. Area based targeting therefore misses a large proportion of the poorest pupils – including in many rural areas. As a result, there is a huge gap between poor children in different parts of the country: in Kensington and Chelsea, 59% of poor children get five good GCSEs, while in Rutland, it’s 14%.

Policy Detail

The Pupil Premium would be available to the school which each disadvantaged pupil attended. It would be attached to those children entitled to Free School Meals – the million poorest children. The Pupil Premium would be set nationally and it would top up a national per-pupil base funding figure. It will raise the poorest children’s school funding to private school levels, with the average school receiving around £2500 extra for every child entitled to free school meals on their roll.

Figures are available for the predicted amount of money each local authority will receive, and can be calculated for individual schools.

Costs/Savings

This policy costs £2.5bn a year, and will be introduced in the second year of the Parliament after our jobs stimulus package, paid for from savings in Government such as our proposed reforms to tax credits (which will save £1.5bn) and administrative savings in the Department for Education and quangos (which save an additional £1bn).

2. Recent figures obtained by the Liberal Democrats show that:

  • The poorest children are only half as likely as their better-off classmates to get 5 good GCSEs including English and maths
  • Last year one in three children left primary school without being able to read and write properly
  • Nearly 10,000 5-7 year olds are taught in classes so big that they are illegal
  • More than half of all applicants accepted to degree courses in 2008 were from the top two social classes

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply